header-logo header-logo

10 December 2021
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Legal News , National Health Service
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Litigating against the NHS―getting it right

66827
The annual eye-watering legal bill faced by the NHS never fails to shock

It has sparked heated debate about how best to meet the needs of patients affected by clinical negligence while minimising the legal bill for the NHS―might a ‘no fault’ system work better, for example?

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Hugh Johnson and Miriam Spencer, of Stewarts, weigh up the current system of litigating against the NHS and ask―could there be a better way of doing this? Along the way, they highlight that the legal bill is actually reducing year on year.

They write: ‘Not only are the litigation costs reducing, but the number of new claims reported each year has remained reasonably consistent. Indeed, it may be argued that with a seven-year average of 11,200 new claims per year, the claims volume is very low. In contrast, health charity The King’s Fund now estimates that the NHS makes 1.5m patient interventions a day.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll