header-logo header-logo

15 May 2026
Issue: 8161 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Health , Child law
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception

249523
© Shutterstck/MyBears
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week

Examining Re N (Paternity: Unregulated Sperm Donor), Hurren explains how Sir Andrew McFarlane concluded that granting the declaration would be ‘manifestly contrary to public policy’. The donor, alleged to have fathered around 180 children, was found to be operating outside the tightly regulated Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act framework.

Hurren says the judgment reinforces why Parliament strictly controls gamete donation, citing concerns over welfare, record-keeping and exploitation.

While the president stressed the decision was confined to ‘extreme facts’, Hurren describes the case as ‘a cautionary tale’ for prospective parents considering private donor arrangements without legal advice or clinic safeguards.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll