header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Is the cap off for litigation funders?

21 April 2020
Issue: 7883 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
The Arkin cap, which protects third-party litigation funders, will survive the Court of Appeal’s recent refusal to apply it, but in a new light, an advocate has argued.

The Arkin cap, which stems from a 2005 case, limits a third-party funder’s liability to pay costs to the sum the funder paid to its unsuccessful claimant. In February, however, the Court of Appeal unanimously held a third-party funder liable for all the defendant’s costs and refused to apply the Arkin cap, in Money & Anor v Chapelgate [2020] EWCA Civ 246.   

Writing in NLJ this week, commercial solicitor-advocate Thomas Wingfield considers the impact of the Court of Appeal’s decision. Is it the end for the Arkin cap? How will this affect litigation funders?

Wingfield notes that the cap was always controversial, with many people including Lord Justice Jackson, in his review of civil litigation costs, of the opinion that it tilted the playing field too far in favour of funders. He also points out that the court in Arkin held that judges retain a wide discretion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll