header-logo header-logo

17 September 2020
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Legal News , International justice
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Iran v US―sanctions & a nuclear snub for Trump

The US has sought unilaterally to re-introduce sanctions against Iran in August but has been ‘simply ignored’, Marc Weller, Professor of International Law at Cambridge University, writes in NLJ this week

The Iran nuclear deal of 2015―called the ‘worst deal ever’ by Donald Trump―committed Tehran to abandoning its reputed nuclear weapons programme. However, parties could bring the sanctions back into operation through a unilateral claim of significant non-compliance to the UN Security Council. The US did this but was ignored.

‘If this position is maintained, this would represent an unprecedented defeat for the Trump administration,’ Weller says.

‘After the extensive period of US hostility to multilateralism, multilateralism has bitten back, it seems.’

Weller outlines how he believes the US bungled the Iran sanctions snapback, and looks at the ‘emerging and increasingly serious pattern of non-compliance’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll