header-logo header-logo

02 June 2023
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , International , Legal services
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: India welcomes foreign lawyers

124244
India has opened its legal market to foreign firms. What opportunities have arisen as a result, and what restrictions apply? In this week’s NLJ, Rupa Lakha, partner, and Neeva Desai, trainee solicitor, at Charles Russell Speechlys, take a look at the significant potential for both Indian and foreign law firms.

They explain the restrictions regarding contentious and non-contentious work, note that the bulk of legal work is non-contentious, and highlight other changes afoot in the Indian legal market such as lawtech.

They write that the interests of Indian lawyers are unlikely to be disadvantaged by the liberalisation of the market, and note there will be more to come. The authors say: ‘It has been widely acknowledged across the Indian and English legal communities, that this is just a first step in a larger roadmap to liberalisation.’ 

Read more on the new opportunities here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll