header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Indemnity costs & unreasonable conduct

25 November 2022
Issue: 8004 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
101295
How high a hurdle must be cleared before a court will grant indemnity costs on the basis of unreasonable conduct? Writing in this week’s NLJ, Masood Ahmed, University of Leicester and Lal Akhter, Med Chambers, Leicester, tackle this important question.

Ahmed & Akhter look at the judicial approach to indemnity costs, briefly introducing a variety of caselaw examples while highlighting that each case will be determined on its own facts. What level of unreasonable conduct takes place, what efforts are made to negotiate, and what evidence is put forward?

They cover, in detail, a recent case (Evans v R&V) where ‘the decision provides an important reminder of the test that must be satisfied before a court will grant indemnity costs’.

See here for the full article.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll