header-logo header-logo

31 March 2023
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Five decades of family law reviewed

117285
Family law specialist, solicitor-advocate and commentator David Burrows looks back at his 50 years in family law, in this week’s NLJ. What’s changed? And how does the reality of some of those changes differ from what was originally envisaged? What could be improved?

Burrows, an NLJ columnist, looks back to the genesis of mediation which ‘we all thought’ would be government-funded. He reflects how his working life was ‘transformed’ by the Children Act 1989 and the Child Support Act 1991.

Burrows also questions the point of separate rules for family and civil proceedings. ‘Sometimes they are in parallel, sometimes they needlessly diverge. I am a fan of CPR 1998. But for the rule-makers to have created two sets of rules helps no one. And what is truly remarkable, the respective sets of rule-makers seem rarely to talk to one another.’ 

Read more on Burrows' 50 years in family law here.

Issue: 8019 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll