header-logo header-logo

23 February 2024
Issue: 8060 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Fast and efficient summary judgment or slow path to trial?

160016

Does the slow route deliver better justice, asks Dr Anil Balan in this week’s NLJ

Balan is referring to summary judgment under Pt 24 of the Civil Procedure Rules, a ‘legal procedure that allows judges to rule on cases without a full trial if one party’s claim has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason to have a trial, saving time and money for all involved’.

‘But like any shortcut,’ Balan notes, ‘it raises concerns: does it trample on the fundamental right to a fair trial?’

Balan sets out recent case law illustrating the pitfalls and safeguards at play. He highlights the advantages of a ‘robust appeal system’ and of judges working within a well-defined framework to ensure clarity and transparency. He writes that, with clear guidelines in place, the ‘crucial balance’ can be maintained.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll