header-logo header-logo

21 October 2022
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Criminal , Technology
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Does the Fraud Act need updating?

98015
It’s been 15 years since the Fraud Act 2006 took effect, and the scale and types of fraud have changed considerably. 

In this week’s NLJ, Stewart Hey & Abigail Rushton, of Charles Russell Speechlys, assess the Act’s success to date and outline outstanding issues.

Hey & Rushton contend that, for the Act to continue to succeed, three key issues should be considered—sentencing, the Act’s extra-jurisdictional reach, and the technological challenges of prosecuting fraud. They analyse each in turn.

Fraud is now the most common crime in England and Wales, and is said to cost the UK economy between £137bn and £190bn each year. Hey & Rushton write: ‘It is important that the UK has the legal framework to deal with the most complex cases of fraud and economic crime.’

See the full article here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll