header-logo header-logo

09 September 2020
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Does the Arkin cap still fit?

Litigation funding is on the rise, providing financing solutions to increasing numbers of claimants

Writing in NLJ this week, Georgina Squire, partner at Rosling King, charts the development of the Arkin cap (where the funded party is unsuccessful, the funder’s liability for costs is restricted to the amount funded).

Given recent case law, does the cap still exist? The judicial approach to litigation funding has evolved as the funding industry itself has grown and changed.

Squire also notes the arrival of start-up companies in the litigating funding industry, which have expanded the bandwidth of funded claims to include lower value as well as large value litigation.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll