header-logo header-logo

17 September 2020
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Legal News , Mental health
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Consenting adults?

The complex and sensitive law on capacity to have sexual relations, is examined in NLJ this week by barrister Laura Davidson, No5 Chambers

Davidson looks at the recent case of A Local Authority v JB [2020] EWCA Civ 735, which concerned a man with difficulties in social interactions due to his Asperger’s Syndrome. He had a tendency to send inappropriate and sexually explicit and/or harassing messages to women and, due to a high risk he would commit a sexual assault, he received 1:1 supervision outside his supported living placement. He had been assessed by a clinical psychologist as unable to understand the concept of consent. However, the Court of Protection held that he did have capacity for sexual relations.    

Davidson covers the case, the appeal and the courts' reasoning throughout, and concludes with a three-page table summarising the key points of all the cases mentioned in the judgment.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll