header-logo header-logo

12 August 2022
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Commercial success or committing an offence―the boundaries of reserved legal activities

90472
What is a reserved legal activity? The answer, writes John Gould, senior partner, Russell-Cooke, in this week’s NLJ, is increasingly hard to define

While the general public think lawyers and legal services are regulated, a large number of providers are not? So where are the boundaries, and how do you know when they’ve been crossed?

‘With increasing numbers of non-regulated providers, the boundaries of what they can and cannot do are ever more important,’ says Gould.

‘Yet these boundaries are not impenetrable barriers, but rather a zone of jeopardy within which an unauthorised entrant may either find that they can enjoy commercial success, or else be guilty of a criminal offence.’

In this article, Gould looks at the definitions, the issues at stake and the case for modernisation.

Issue: 7991 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll