header-logo header-logo

28 October 2022
Issue: 8000 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Technology , Criminal
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Children urgently need the Online Safety Bill

Current data protection safeguards for children need improving, writes Emily Carter in this week’s NLJ, which is why it’s important to continue with the Online Safety Bill despite inherent challenges.

Carter, a public law partner at Kingsley Napley, outlines existing protections including the Children’s Code, which was introduced by the Information Commissioner’s Office a year ago. She looks at what’s covered in the Bill and how it will be implemented.

Carter emphasises the need to push ahead with the Bill. She writes: ‘The organisations instrumental to the success of the legislation need certainty sooner rather than later in order to plan ahead. They will need to develop their internal systems and processes in line with the anticipated legislative obligations, especially the bigger social media platforms with existing self-regulation schemes.’

See the full article here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll