header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Be careful with the evidence of unregulated experts

27 October 2023
Issue: 8046 / Categories: Legal News , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
144117
What is an expert? Do they have to be attached to a regulatory body? What type of accreditation is required? In this week’s NLJ, Dr Chris Pamplin, editor of the UK Register of Expert Witnesses, looks at two recent cases on this conundrum

Pamplin writes that, in one case, the Association of Clinical Psychologists ‘submitted this was a stark and troubling example of an individual who held herself out as an expert but had neither the qualifications nor the relevant skills to do so’.

He includes guidance handed down by Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, on the use of unregulated experts. Finally, Pamplin urges the courts to exercise particular vigilance and rigour when deciding whether to admit the evidence of such an unregulated expert.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll