The case concerned the enforcement or otherwise of a foreign-seated arbitration award against a UK consumer. The claimants are global digital cryptoasset traders. Hill covers the case in detail, looking at the implications and arguments.
She
writes that the case ‘should act as a shot across the bows to crypto exchanges,
marketplaces and other payment service providers that continue to include
onerous arbitration and jurisdiction clauses in B2C contracts with UK
consumers’.





