header-logo header-logo

17 November 2023
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Agnew & the impact of the EU Retained Law Act

146639
A limited shelf-life could be the fate of some aspects of the Supreme Court judgment on holiday pay in Chief Constable of Police in Northern Ireland v Agnew

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Charles Pigott, professional support lawyer, Mills & Reeve, investigates how the EU law thread in the landmark judgment on deductions in holiday pay can be applied to the rest of the UK.

Pigott asks, secondly, where Angew will stand ‘once the general principles of EU law have been excised from UK law by the EU Retained Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023.

For example, the 2023 Act provides that ‘no general principle’ of EU law is part of domestic law after the end of 2023. Pigott writes: ‘The Act does not define the general principles of EU law referred to, but they almost certainly include the principle of equivalence and the Marleasing principle, both of which were deployed in Agnew.’ 

Issue: 8049 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll