header-logo header-logo

23 February 2024
Issue: 8060 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: A UK written constitution? No thanks!

160023

Could the UK ever have a written constitution, and how would it affect the UK Supreme Court?

In this week’s NLJ, Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC looks across the pond to the US Supreme Court, which has powers to ‘nullify legislation’ by declaring it incompatible with the written US constitution.

Bindman highlights the disadvantages of the US system. He writes that, in the UK, there ‘are still politicians who favour a written constitution. The politicisation of the US Supreme Court should be a powerful warning against it.’

Is it inevitable that a written constitution would undermine judicial independence? Bindman lists the many far-reaching judgments in the US since the last three appointments were made. He discusses former US president Donald Trump’s recent involvement in court cases and also notes recent political pressures that have come about in the UK.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll