header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: When AI hallucinates, lawyers risk real-world sanctions

241420
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools

From US sanctions to UK High Court referrals under the Hamid jurisdiction, courts have made clear that professional duties cannot be delegated to technology.

Singh explains that AI systems predict plausible-sounding text rather than verify truth, meaning fabricated cases can appear alarmingly authentic. As Dame Victoria Sharp warned, misuse carries ‘serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence’.

While techniques such as retrieval-augmented generation may reduce risks, Singh stresses that every reference must still be checked manually. His message is unequivocal: ‘Legal research should never be completely outsourced to AI’. Used responsibly, AI can augment practice; used lazily, it risks misconduct, reputational damage and loss of trust.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll