header-logo header-logo

11 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Animal welfare
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: What to do about FIDO? Pets after divorce

215636
Disputes over pets during divorce are on the rise. In this week’s NLJ, Shivi Rajput, partner at Stowe Family Law, looks at recent developments in the law.

Rajput writes: ‘The state of Alaska was the first in the US to require courts to consider the wellbeing of animals in divorce cases, empowering judges to award “joint custody” in a manner similar to child arrangements.

‘England and Wales may now be on the cusp of a similar shift, as evidenced by the recent case of FI v DO.’ This case, in the family courts last year, involved an acrimonious dispute over the family’s golden retriever.

Rajput covers the case in detail and suggests ideas for reform of the law, given the importance of pets in family life. 
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Animal welfare
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll