header-logo header-logo

14 August 2026
Issue: 8174 / Categories: Legal News , International justice
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: What future for International Law?

257124
As geopolitical conflicts multiply, the widening gap between the rules of international law and the conduct of powerful states is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore

Simon Parsons considers this loss of confidence through the UN Charter framework, under which Article 2(4) prohibits the use of force and Article 51 permits self-defence subject to necessity and proportionality. He links US conduct in the Americas to a revived Monroe Doctrine and argues that the weakening of “Pax Americana” in Europe is placing greater responsibility on European states for their own security. Russia’s war in Ukraine and US action against Iran also raise serious questions about compliance with the Charter and the limitations of international accountability mechanisms.

Parsons is particularly concerned by reliance on a politically defined “rules-based international order” as an alternative to orthodox international law. His warning is stark: if powerful states increasingly interpret international rules according to their own national interests, other states may feel equally entitled to disregard established legal constraints on the use of force. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll