header-logo header-logo

05 September 2025
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Defamation , Dispute resolution , Fraud , Human rights
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: SLAPPed shut?

228911
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics

England and Wales is a popular forum due to claimant-friendly defamation laws and the ‘loser pays’ rule. Whittam highlights the psychological toll on defendants and the difficulty of early dismissal under current procedural rules.

lthough new anti-SLAPP provisions came into force in June 2025, they only apply to economic crime, leaving many abusive claims unchecked. Whittam calls for broader reform to protect public interest speech and prevent litigation from becoming a tool of censorship. Without stronger safeguards, free expression remains vulnerable to legal bullying.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll