header-logo header-logo

31 July 2026
Issue: 8172 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , CPR
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Security denied

256237
© Getty images
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense

Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp analyses Magomedov v Rabinovich, in which the court concluded CPR Part 47 provides a self-contained code that does not confer such jurisdiction. The judge warned that adopting a 'novel interpretation' of the rules could create unnecessary satellite litigation.

Dunkley argues, however, that the judgment sidesteps the more fundamental question of whether detailed assessment proceedings amount to a separate 'claim' for CPR purposes. She contrasts the decision with Solicitors Act assessments and suggests a more holistic approach would better reflect the substance of the proceedings. The ruling is likely to prompt continued debate among costs practitioners about the scope of CPR 25.

Issue: 8172 / Categories: Legal News , Costs , CPR
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll