header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Sanctions tripwires

261029
© Getty images
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential

Writing in NLJ this week, Benjamin Wells of Belgravia Law warns that exposure extends beyond named parties to witnesses, experts, funders, banks and corporate ownership structures. Screening must continue throughout a case, while overlapping UK, EU and US regimes require separate consideration.

Legal services licences have limits, and specific OFSI applications may take weeks or months. Even licensed payments can stall when banks refuse to process them, making agreed settlement mechanics and willing payment providers crucial.

Frozen assets complicate enforcement, litigation funding and security for costs. Sanctions can also affect contractual obligations: RTI v MUR Shipping confirmed that reasonable endeavours did not require accepting an alternative, non-contractual payment method.

Wells urges practitioners to integrate compliance ‘from the first client meeting’. Clear records, realistic licensing timetables and advance checks on funding and recovery can prevent costly disruption later on.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll