header-logo header-logo

17 July 2026
Issue: 8170 / Categories: Legal News , Sanctions , Criminal , International , Compliance , Transport , Commercial
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Sanctions compliance enters a new era

254932
© Pixel8000/Shutterstock
Businesses face a step change in sanctions compliance after sweeping UK reforms targeting proxies, shadow fleets and Russian oil exports

Writing in NLJ this week, Paul Henty, partner at Beale & Company Solicitors LLP, says the supposedly 'miscellaneous' amendments are anything but. New 'end-user controls' mean companies can commit criminal offences if they ignore government notifications identifying apparently innocent counterparties as proxies for sanctioned states. The Russia amendments also target 'oil laundering' through third-country refineries, widen restrictions on maritime services and add construction services to prohibited professional services.

Henty warns enforcement is tightening, with larger civil penalties, strict liability and increasing expectations around due diligence. Screening lists alone are no longer enough, he argues. Instead, businesses must exercise 'active vigilance', investigating supply chains, counterparties and regulatory notices if they are to avoid potentially costly enforcement action.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll