header-logo header-logo

10 January 2025
Issue: 8099 / Categories: Legal News , Crypto , Criminal , Fraud , Technology
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Recovery of stolen cryptoassets possible thanks to recent law

202615
Could law enforcement agencies tasked with recovering stolen cryptoassets have a silver bullet in their arsenal? In this week’s NLJ, Ashley Fairbrother, partner, and Joe Nahal-Macdonald, senior associate, at Edmonds Marshall McMahon, and Sarah Wood, barrister at 5 St Andrews Hill, examine the new powers provided by Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, courtesy of legislation implemented in 2024.

Part 5 now provides for ‘the seizure, detention, freezing and forfeiture of cryptoassets and related items’, and these powers are exercisable by the magistrates’ court. This could be highly useful, given British Virgin Islands-based company Tether’s ‘ability to destroy tokens (burning) and issue new ones (minting) to manage supply or adjust token balances across different blockchains’.

Fairbrother, Nahal-Macdonald and Wood write: ‘The choice by law enforcement must be purposive constructive of legislation, to use their most powerful weapon—POCA 2002—to tackle fraudsters and help their victims, which US law enforcement has shown no hesitation in doing.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll