header-logo header-logo

20 February 2026
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Legal News , Rule of law , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age

242971
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’

Social media campaigns and political polarisation risk turning advocacy into moral alignment. Everyone deserves representation, he argues, even the ‘unpopular defendants’ and controversial causes that test public sentiment.

But lawyers must also maintain boundaries between professional detachment and personal activism. The system depends on counsel acting ‘without fear of vilification’, and on a profession that distinguishes clearly between advocacy and campaigning.

Issue: 8150 / Categories: Legal News , Rule of law , Profession
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll