header-logo header-logo

14 November 2025
Issue: 8139 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , ADR , International , Dispute resolution
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Malaysia’s arbitration overhaul

235675
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal

Coming into force on 1 January 2026, the new suite unifies six frameworks—arbitration, Islamic arbitration, mediation, sports, adjudication, and domain name disputes.

The 2026 rules embed transparency by mandating disclosure of third-party funders, formalise the new AIAC Court of Arbitration, and expand eligibility for fast-track proceedings to disputes under US$3m. They also introduce mandatory technical reviews of draft awards and encourage diversity in arbitrator appointments.

Choi notes that these changes reflect Malaysia’s bid to modernise its dispute resolution landscape, aligning it with global arbitral practices and boosting investor confidence through procedural clarity, speed, and accountability.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll