header-logo header-logo

12 June 2026
Issue: 8165 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Legacy Act ruling leaves rights and remedies apart

252167
© 2017 JMiks/Shutterstock
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised

Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Otchie of 12 Old Square Chambers analyses the court’s ruling on the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023.

The judgment confirmed that investigations into alleged unlawful killings and torture must remain capable, at least in principle, of leading to criminal accountability. However, while the court found aspects of the statutory scheme incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights, it stopped short of disapplying the legislation, issuing only a declaration of incompatibility.

Otchie argues that the decision reflects a constitutional balancing act between judicial oversight and parliamentary sovereignty. The result is a judgment that preserves demanding rights standards while limiting their immediate practical effect. As he notes, Dillon sits at the intersection of 'truth and accountability' and legislative control.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll