header-logo header-logo

23 January 2026
Issue: 8146 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Legal aid focus , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Justice for some, access for few?

240528
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026

Parliamentary committees have delivered ‘scathing’ criticism of the MoJ’s stewardship of legal aid, with one MP suggesting it be renamed the ‘Ministry of Justice (for Certain People)’.

While ministers talk up third-party funding, court decisions such as PACCAR and Evans v Barclays have chilled the market, raising hurdles for collective actions. Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe, notes that the UK now ranks ‘30th out of 31’ comparable nations for affordable civil justice. Digital fixes have failed the ‘digitally excluded’, and successive reforms have merely shifted risk onto lawyers and funders.

The result? A justice system admired abroad but increasingly inaccessible at home.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll