header-logo header-logo

31 July 2026
Issue: 8172 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Jurisdiction , International
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Home is where intent lies

256243
© Getty images
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims

Writing in NLJ this week, Melissa Lesson of Mills & Reeve analyses Ferrara v Ferrara, where England remained the wife's domicile of choice despite several years living in Italy. The court attached particular weight to contemporaneous evidence, including communications showing she never intended the move to be permanent.

Lesson says the decision provides a valuable 'roadmap' for lawyers handling international divorce disputes, particularly when forum and domicile are contested. She also highlights research showing many families relocating overseas fail to seek legal advice about differing matrimonial property regimes.

The judgment confirms that forum conveniens is not simply about geography but about achieving fair financial outcomes, meaning jurisdiction may ultimately determine whether a spouse leaves a marriage with security or 'with nothing'.

Issue: 8172 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Jurisdiction , International
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll