header-logo header-logo

19 September 2025
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Costs
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Gaslighting & post-separation assets

230027
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts

The wife was awarded 43% of total assets, including 40% of the port proceeds. The judge penalised the husband’s obstructive behaviour with cost orders and asset valuation adjustments.

Notably, the trial embraced tech-savvy management, using tablets for bundles to streamline proceedings. The judgment offers a cautionary tale on disclosure failures and a pragmatic view on litigation costs, which reached £1.44m—deemed proportionate given the case’s complexity.

Issue: 8131 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll