header-logo header-logo

08 August 2025
Issue: 8128 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , ADR , Dispute resolution , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Final means final in arbitration enforcement

227492
In this week's issue of NLJ, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester and Osman Mohammed of the University of Birmingham examine the Commercial Court’s decision in Deinon Insurance Brokers LLC v Reen and others [2025] EWHC 1263 (Comm). The court refused a stay of execution on four arbitral awards, reaffirming that enforcement must proceed without delay once statutory challenges under the Arbitration Act 1996 are exhausted

The defendants argued that Dubai proceedings concerning beneficial ownership created ‘special circumstances’, but Mr Justice Saini dismissed this as a collateral attack designed to frustrate enforcement. He emphasised that arbitration awards are final and binding, and that procedural manoeuvres must not undermine the integrity of the arbitration process.

The judgment sends a strong message: courts will resist attempts to delay or circumvent enforcement and will uphold party autonomy and the principles of fair, timely dispute resolution.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll