header-logo header-logo

17 January 2025
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Fewer cases, less human rights, no criminal: the Supreme Court in 2024

203853
What went on at the Supreme Court in 2024? In this week’s NLJ, Brice Dickson, Emeritus Professor of Law, Queen’s University Belfast, reviews the cases, volume of work and topics covered in the past year.

Notable decisions included financial relief where a hugely wealthy Russian couple divorced, the extent of a doctor’s duty of care, and whether a water company could be sued for private nuisance for discharging untreated sewage into a canal.

The court decided 43 cases—less than usual, due to a reduction in the number of petitions to appeal (PTAs) granted. Dickson writes: ‘It is difficult to explain why so many PTAs are now being refused. The justices who sit on the PTA panels do not give reasons for their refusals beyond saying that the case in question does not raise an arguable point of law or a point of law of general public importance at this time.’

Looking ahead, Dickson notes the deputy president, Lord Hodge, intends to retire at the end of 2025. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll