header-logo header-logo

31 July 2026
Issue: 8172 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Civil way , CPR
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Farewell to Chancery

The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary

In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold points out that the judiciary says the reforms will improve flexibility, governance and international appeal. He nonetheless remains sceptical, asking: 'So why bother?' if practice will remain largely unchanged. 

Gold also examines the latest Civil Procedure Rule changes and argues that, despite assurances there will be no material practical difference, 'the jury is out again'.

He reviews reforms introducing civil behaviour orders, revised arbitration appeal procedures and changes to mediation pilots, alongside new requirements for family group decision meetings before care proceedings.

Gold also highlights updated Legal Aid Agency procedures intended to simplify payment for family advocates. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll