header-logo header-logo

08 May 2026
Issue: 8160 / Categories: Legal News , Crypto , Cybercrime , Fraud , Technology , International , Criminal
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Crypto freeze, British shrug?

249007
© Getty images
A pioneering cryptoasset recovery case has exposed an arguable failure by UK law enforcement to use powers already available under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Writing in NLJ this week, Ashley Fairbrother and Rhys Evans of Edmonds Marshall McMahon recount how their client, a US citizen duped in a devastating romance fraud, lost nearly $1m after being manipulated by a fake ‘Kensington-based diplomat’

Blockchain investigators traced around $800,000 in USDT to Tether-controlled wallets, but despite repeated requests, five UK agencies declined to act. Instead, a Californian police officer and the US IRS Criminal Investigations Division secured seizure warrants and ultimately recovered the funds.

The article champions Tether’s ‘burn-and-remint’ mechanism as ‘a standard tool of modern asset recovery’, and warns that British victims are being left to watch ‘their stolen pensions sit immobile on the blockchain’ while overseas authorities intervene.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll