header-logo header-logo

14 November 2025
Issue: 8139 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Criminal , Fraud , Liability , Bribery , Company , Compliance , Risk management
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Corporate crime net widens

235678
The Crime and Policing Bill could vastly expand corporate criminal liability through its new ‘senior manager test’, warns Tom McNeill of BCL Solicitors in NLJ this week. The sweeping test makes organisations criminally liable for offences committed by senior managers within their authority

The reform, McNeill argues, shifts corporate criminal law further towards deterrence and away from fairness or direct culpability. The test extends liability even where the company gains no benefit and lacks a 'reasonable procedures' defence.

McNeill traces the evolution from Tesco v Nattrass to today’s 'failure to prevent' model, showing how criminal fault has been replaced by assumptions of defective corporate culture. He warns that treating organisations as moral actors risks punishing compliant companies for rogue conduct.

While aimed at accountability, the new regime, he concludes, prioritises ease of prosecution over principled justice.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll