header-logo header-logo

22 May 2026
Issue: 8162 / Categories: Legal News , Governance , Liability , Fraud , Criminal , Risk management
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Corporate crackdown puts senior managers on notice

250381
© Getty images
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations

The new regime, introduced under the Crime and Policing Act 2026, extends liability beyond economic crime and broadens the definition of ‘senior manager’ to include those playing a ‘significant role’ in management or compliance. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons of Bath Spa University warns that companies can now be liable for criminal acts committed by senior staff acting within either their actual or ‘apparent authority’.

The reforms move beyond the old ‘identification doctrine’ tied to directors and controlling minds, meaning HR leaders, compliance managers and other executives may now fall within scope.

Parsons says organisations should urgently review governance structures, train senior staff to identify legal risks and strengthen compliance systems before ‘minor problems’ escalate into full-blown corporate criminal liability.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll