header-logo header-logo

31 July 2026
Issue: 8172 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Commercial , Governance
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Company conspiracy clarified

256241
© Getty images
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes

Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Carroll of B P Collins examines Lux Films Ltd v Fowler, where a director who allegedly diverted business opportunities through his own company failed to rely on an 'alter ego' defence.

The court held that the corporate form cannot be used 'as a shield to defeat liability' where it forms part of the wrongful conduct. Carroll says the decision provides long-awaited clarity following uncertainty in earlier authorities and is likely to make it easier for claimants to pursue both directors and companies acting in concert.

The judgment could also increase the scope for corporate assets to be targeted where directors misuse closely controlled companies.

Issue: 8172 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Commercial , Governance
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll