header-logo header-logo

01 November 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Breach a judgment embargo at your peril

195045

Lawyers who breach a judgment embargo face potentially serious consequences—particularly where a criminal case is concerned

Writing in this week’s NLJ, criminal solicitor David Bloom, associate director at Sonn Macmillan Walker Ltd, looks at a recent Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) case, in which ‘the court carried out an exacting (and doubtlessly excruciating for those concerned) examination of the events that led to two separate breaches of its embargoed judgment’.

The court set out principles for legal practitioners, including that there is no excuse for not understanding the system of sending draft judgments under embargo.

Bloom advises all chambers and firms to ensure they train staff and set out policies on embargoed judgments. His article includes a handy box of tips on what you can do, what you can’t do, and what you must do if there’s a leak.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll