header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Breach a judgment embargo at your peril

01 November 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
195045

Lawyers who breach a judgment embargo face potentially serious consequences—particularly where a criminal case is concerned

Writing in this week’s NLJ, criminal solicitor David Bloom, associate director at Sonn Macmillan Walker Ltd, looks at a recent Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) case, in which ‘the court carried out an exacting (and doubtlessly excruciating for those concerned) examination of the events that led to two separate breaches of its embargoed judgment’.

The court set out principles for legal practitioners, including that there is no excuse for not understanding the system of sending draft judgments under embargo.

Bloom advises all chambers and firms to ensure they train staff and set out policies on embargoed judgments. His article includes a handy box of tips on what you can do, what you can’t do, and what you must do if there’s a leak.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll