header-logo header-logo

18 September 2026
Issue: 8177 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Privilege , Regulatory , Risk management , Procedure & practice , Fraud
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Auditors tighten the disclosure screws

259137
© Getty images
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations

Writing in NLJ this week, Mark Beardsworth, Sharon Takhar and Nikara Rangesh of Signature Litigation say the reforms give auditors greater incentive to engage early with the FRC over fraud, misconduct and going-concern concerns. That could mean earlier demands for internal investigation material—and new danger for privilege, limited waivers and control of regulatory strategy.

Companies cannot assume an auditor will accept their view of whether documents are privileged; in A v B, the court confirmed that an auditor must form its own view.

The authors urge boards, audit committees and in-house lawyers to build privilege in from the outset, separate factual audit material from legal analysis, control waivers in writing and coordinate self-reporting decisions early. In this ‘new landscape’, disclosure is no longer administrative housekeeping: it is regulatory strategy.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll