header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Artificial intelligence , Legal services , Fees , Equality
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: AI comes for the billable hour

241895
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’

McDougall says AI doesn’t merely speed up legal work; it destroys the fiction that time equals value. Tasks that once took hours can now be done in minutes, making billing by endurance ‘absurd’ and potentially perverse.

The shift, he suggests, could also loosen one of law’s most stubborn gender choke points, replacing presenteeism with judgement, risk management and leadership.

Sceptics have ‘heard this before’, McDougall concedes, but this time lawyers aren’t being asked to change their incentives—they’re being overtaken. Once clients experience faster, cheaper, high-quality output, ‘the clock cannot be turned back’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll