header-logo header-logo

18 April 2025
Issue: 8113 / Categories: Legal News , Health , Procedure & practice , Human rights
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: A judge’s perspective on safeguards in the assisted dying bill

216140
The safeguarding role of a High Court judge in the assisted dying bill currently before Parliament has been replaced by the oversight of a panel comprising a psychiatrist, social worker and lawyer. In this week’s NLJ, Sir Mark Hedley, a retired High Court judge, shares his reflections on the loss of the judicial role itself.

Sir Mark does so ‘from the perspective of 11 years’ service as a High Court judge of the Family Division, who heard some ten cases in which my decision led (or was expected to lead) to the death of a child or an adult. Each case remains seared in my memory even after 12 years of retirement’.

While Sir Mark emphasises that he offers no comment on the merits of the Bill itself, he makes several observations on the operation and consequences of the Bill, which the legislators may not have appreciated and from the point of view of an experienced judge. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll