header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Opinion , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The NLJ Column

Taxing times as Law Lords consider Jones v Garnett

The Law Lords could deliver judgment before the end of July in the Arctic Systems case—Jones v Garnett—which could affect up to 340,000 small businesses.

The case concerns whether dividends paid by a company, Arctic Systems Ltd, to a working shareholder, Mrs Jones, consisted of income arising under a settlement as defined by s 660a(1) of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (TA 1988) and so should be treated as the income of the company’s director and her husband, Mr Jones.

The couple set up a small IT company where Mr Jones was the sole director, and both spouses paid £1 for one share each in the company. Both took low salaries and received the balance of the company’s profits by dividend, which was split equally between them and which saved them tax. HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) successfully argued in the High Court that the dividends going to Mrs Jones could be reallocated under settlements legislation to Mr Jones and extra tax sought upon them. This was overturned in the Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll