header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The NLJ Column

Is the balance of justice shifting too far in favour of victims?

At a recent public meeting of the Prison Reform Trust, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, delivered an eloquent and complex paper which challenged our perceptions on the axis of care between victims and perpetrators of crime.

A delicate balance

It is, indeed, a delicate balance. Instinct, and let us acknowledge it, emotion, tend to shift the balance decisively in favour of the victim. That is not surprising. Who cannot but feel sympathy for the battered victim of violence, sexual assault or empathise with those whose homes have been violated by burglary.

Yet neither is it controversial to state that one of the primary purposes of custody should be rehabilitation, to reproduce into society a safe and balanced individual. After all, that is the best way to reduce crime in the future.

CUSTODIAL OBSESSION?

Presently, we have a prison population of over 80,000 inmates. Does this mean we are a very wicked country, or are we sending people to prison more readily? Williams referred in his paper to a ‘custodial obsession’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll