header-logo header-logo

14 June 2018
Issue: 7797 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

NLJ ADR special

nlj_7797_wallis_0

Challenges to arbitrators ‘remain rare and are even more rarely successful’, Latham & Watkins lawyers write in this week’s NLJ special focus on ADR (alternative dispute resolution). Analysis of London Court of International Arbitration and English court decisions in the past 21 years show challenges have been dealt with ‘robustly and consistently’, say lawyers Philip Clifford QC, Hannah Roos and Eleanor Scogings. They discuss where, how and why challenges may be brought.

Elsewhere, Leonora Riesenburg, chair of the UAE Branch of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, highlights the importance of a new arbitration law and Katherine Yap discusses Smart Maxwell and the key role of Singapore as an arbitration hub. While Tim Wallis, chair of Trust Mediation, introduces the AFM Register of Mediators for personal injury and clinical negligence cases. 

Issue: 7797 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll