header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010 / Rosie Schumm
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Nipping it in the bud

Will the Revised PLP remedy some of the problems of the family law system? Rosie Schumm reports

When Sir Mark Potter, President of the Family Division, set out his Framework for a Family Court in December 2006, he had the long term aim of poviding a consistent and unified national approach in the family courts. One of the key elements of his framework was the plan for the introduction of a new practice direction with regard to the case management of private law children matters.

He also had to address the immediate problem affecting the family justice system, namely, the effect of the mounting pressures and backlogs faced by Cafcass (specifically, in the appointment of guardians and the production of court reports) set against the backdrop of a shortfall in funding.

On 1 April 2010, the long awaited Revised Private Law Programme Practice Direction (PLP) came into effect (courts will have until 4 October 2010 to effect its full implementation).

The revised PLP builds on the success achieved by the combined roles at the first hearing of the judge and Cafcass (introduced

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll