header-logo header-logo

25 October 2023
Issue: 8046 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Nigeria wins $11bn victory against exploitative fraudsters

The Federal Republic of Nigeria has won its High Court challenge against an $11bn arbitration award granted to Process & Industrial Developments (PID), a hedge fund-backed company registered in the British Virgin Islands

The dispute arose from a 20-page gas supply and processing document agreed between the two parties in 2010. A dispute followed, which went to an arbitral tribunal as per the agreement, where in 2017 Nigeria was found to be in breach and liable to pay PID $6.6bn at 7% interest, bringing the amount at stake up to $11bn, which would have had significant financial implications for the Nigerian economy.

Ruling in Federal Republic of Nigeria v Process & Industrial Developments [2023] EWHC 2638 (Comm), Mr Justice Knowles said: ‘Nigeria did almost nothing to perform the [agreement] after signing but, according to Nigeria, neither did the other party.’

Knowles J found that PID obtained the arbitral award ‘only by practising the most severe abuses of the arbitral process’. In a lengthy judgment, he found PID and certain individuals associated with it had committed bribery, relied on knowingly false evidence and corruptly and improperly obtained Nigeria’s internal legal documents to benefit its own position in the arbitration.

He highlighted the impact of the ‘remarkable but very real’ case on the reputation of arbitration as a dispute resolution process, stating: ‘The risk is that arbitration as a process becomes less reliable, less able to find difficult but important new legal ground, and more vulnerable to fraud.’

Shaistah Akhtar (pictured), partner at Mishcon de Reya, who led Nigeria's legal team, said the judgment was ‘a historic result for Nigeria and its people.

‘The Nigerian government's resolve in pursuing a just outcome led to it uncovering overwhelming evidence of bribery and corruption. We are pleased that the judge recognised the severity of the fraud perpetrated against the people of Nigeria in his judgment, and trust that this landmark decision will deter other potential fraudsters and their backers from exploiting the legal system in the pursuit of monetary gain.’

A Federal Republic of Nigeria spokesperson said: ‘The brazen fraud perpetrated by PID has finally been revealed for all to see despite their consistent attempts to frustrate the passage of justice.’

Issue: 8046 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll