header-logo header-logo

24 July 2013
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

NICs change for LLP law firms

Draft National Insurance Contributions Bill is a talking point for LLPs

Limited liability partnership law firms would need to consider each individual member separately for national insurance purposes, under the draft National Insurance Contributions Bill, published last week.

Inez Anderson, partner at accountants Smith & Williamson, said: “At the Budget it was announced that the government planned to consult on removing the ‘presumption’ of self-employed status which is applied to members of an LLP.

“That consultation process is ongoing but this Bill as drafted removes the automatic exemption from employment status for national insurance purposes. If enacted as drafted that will mean that from 6 April 2014 it will be necessary to consider each individual member of an LLP separately to determine if they are employed or self-employed for national insurance purposes.

“If employed this will result in employer contributions being due by the LLP. This will leave LLPs with some key decisions.”

The draft Bill also includes a general anti-abuse rule and provisions to make offshore employment intermediaries liable to NICs.

Issue: 7570 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll