header-logo header-logo

17 September 2009
Categories: Legal News , Local government , Public , Housing , Community care
printer mail-detail

Ex-tenants’ “housing” vendetta

Court of Appeal rules council acted legitimately against anti-social former tenant

A local authority was within its rights in applying for a “housing-related” anti-social behaviour injunction (ASBI) against a man who harassed his former neighbours but was no longer a council tenant, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

In Swindon BC v Redpath [2009], Lord Justice Rix, considered the meaning of “housing-related conduct” in s 153A(1) of the Housing Act 1996.

The case turned on whether there was “a sufficient nexus between the local authority and its ex-tenant in respect of his anti-social behaviour against victims in the neighbourhood where he used to live so as to justify, in jurisdictional terms, the local authority’s continuing pursuit of a further anti-social behaviour injunction against its ex-tenant,” Rix LJ said.

The ex-tenant, Michael Redpath, had been evicted in 2006 from a secure tenancy in a village near Swindon following a series of alcohol-related incidents and a determined campaign of harassment against a neighbouring couple, who were home-owners. His behaviour continued. In 2008, the county court granted an ASBI against him.

Redpath appealed, arguing that the court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll