header-logo header-logo

07 January 2016 / David Greene
Issue: 7681 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

​New year: same headache?

nlj_7681_greene

David Greene welcomes the government’s recent U-turn on upping civil court fees but fears the reprieve may be short-lived

2015 ended on a high note with a piece of good news from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) telling us that the increase in the court fees cap that had been proposed is not to proceed for the time being. The government’s response paper painted a picture of wholesale opposition to the increase. Of 110 responses, 103 disagreed with the proposal. Even with that opposition, one always wonders whether it makes any difference. On this occasion it seems to have done so. Perhaps, however, it is a short lived reprieve. In any event civil courts may have achieved a reprieve but many of the proposed increases of fees in other tribunals are being implemented.

Domestic & international arguments

Two arguments always surround the issue of court fees, one domestic and the other international. The domestic question is the balancing exercise between a civil justice process that pays for itself (thus meeting the Osborne goal of an economy in surplus) and the level at which fees affect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll