header-logo header-logo

07 January 2016 / David Greene
Issue: 7681 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

​New year: same headache?

nlj_7681_greene

David Greene welcomes the government’s recent U-turn on upping civil court fees but fears the reprieve may be short-lived

2015 ended on a high note with a piece of good news from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) telling us that the increase in the court fees cap that had been proposed is not to proceed for the time being. The government’s response paper painted a picture of wholesale opposition to the increase. Of 110 responses, 103 disagreed with the proposal. Even with that opposition, one always wonders whether it makes any difference. On this occasion it seems to have done so. Perhaps, however, it is a short lived reprieve. In any event civil courts may have achieved a reprieve but many of the proposed increases of fees in other tribunals are being implemented.

Domestic & international arguments

Two arguments always surround the issue of court fees, one domestic and the other international. The domestic question is the balancing exercise between a civil justice process that pays for itself (thus meeting the Osborne goal of an economy in surplus) and the level at which fees affect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll